Protests
Over eight years, the Black Lives Matter movement has activated between 15 and 26 million people across the world who seek to end racial injustice. Just as social media has documented the reasons for the movement, it has documented the movement’s actions as well. While most of its members act in passive resistance, the Black Lives Matter demonstrations are almost more well-known for the response to it by law enforcement. In the end, however, Black Lives Matter is about bringing communities together to understand and make positive change.
Passive Resistance
The goal of the Black Lives Matter movement is to bring the issue of racial inequality to the forefront of public consciousness. Its “uniquely twenty-first century” nature, supported by social media, has allowed for a decentralized structure with individual chapters that address geographically-specific needs in their communities (Nummi et. Al., 2019). In order to raise awareness about these issues, many of the BLM protests encourage Black community members to share their stories in peaceful demonstrations. In the Black Lives Matter movement, peaceful protest has taken several different forms. Since the movement’s early protests, civil disobedience has been used to disrupt others’ daily lives, in an effort to “dramatize routine attacks on Black life” (Rickford, 2016, p. 36). Often this involves impeding street traffic with marches and sit-ins, but can also take the form of the celebration of Black life through music, dance, poetry, and the visual arts.
Police & Protestors
Despite typically demonstrating passive resistance, the Black Lives Matter movement is often remembered for the brutality with which law enforcement responds to the protests. Research on protests in general indicates that Black-led demonstrations are more likely to have police presence in case of violence than demonstrations led by white organizers (Rafail et. al., 2012, pp. 751-2). Unfortunately, research also suggests that police are “more likely to use force/violence, either alone or in conjunction with arrests, than they are to do nothing” while monitoring protests (Davenport et. al., 2011, p. 166). These statistics have been evident in the media coverage of the Black Lives Matter movement since its inception. In the summer of 2020, protesters and residents alike turned their smartphone cameras to the streets, documenting the brutality of law enforcement during peaceful protests. The overwhelming mass of video evidence against police violence has resulted in greater demands for police reform, especially in the context of protest rights, in the United States (Loor, 2020).
References
Davenport, C., Soule, S. A., & Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Protesting While Black? The Differential Policing of American Activism, 1960 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 152–178. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0003122410395370
Loor, K. J. P. (2020). Tear Gas + Water Hoses + Dispersal Orders: The Fourth Amendment Endorses Brutality in Protest Policing. Boston University Law Review, 100(3), 817–848.
Nummi, J., Jennings, C., & Feagin, J. #BlackLivesMatter: Innovative Black resistance. Sociological Forum, 34(S1), 1042-1064. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/socf.12540
Rafail, P., Soule, S. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2012). Describing and Accounting for the Trends in US Protest Policing, 1960−1995. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(4), 736–765. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0022002711431793
Rickford, R. (2016). Black Lives Matter: Towards a modern practice of mass struggle. New Labor Forum, 25(1), 34-42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26419959